Talk:Regression analysis
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regression analysis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. 
Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · NYT · WP Library 
Archives: 1, 2Autoarchiving period: 3 months 
Regression analysis has been listed as a level4 vital article in Mathematics. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as CClass by the WikiProject Vital Articles. 
This article is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.  

This subject is featured in the Outline of regression analysis, which is incomplete and needs further development. 
Misleading sidebar[edit]
The chart at the top of the "regression series" sidebar is not appropriate to include in any topic in which the form of regression being discussed is NOT that of the chart.
It's EXTREMELY confusing to find an unrelated chart, in the wikipedia position that normally displays a RELATED one.
Terminology[edit]
this may well be an issue with the field of statistics in general and not necessarily one specific to Wikipedia but here it goes.
I found circular confusion by navigating across hyperlinks on this article and related ones, which I think should be rectified. under "General linear regression" a definition is given, which I rather think should be the one of "multiple linear regression". indeed, if one follows the link to the indepth article on linear regression, this is how "multiple linear regression" is defined, with the added remark that this term is distinct from multivariate linear regression following which one in fact lands on the general linear model article.
I would vote for changing that "General linear regression" paragraph title to "Multiple linear regression".
Introduction[edit]
Can we replace the textbook jargon "in which a researcher" (2nd sentence of the article, added 13 October 2019) with less restrictive wording? 109.41.129.26 (talk) 06:39, 14 February 2021 (UTC)